DSS Confirms Walida Abdullahi in Protective Custody Amid Ongoing Investigation
The Department of State Services (DSS) has confirmed that Walida Abdullahi remains in protective custody as investigations continue into allegations that she was abducted and forced into marriage and religious conversion.
Speaking during a meeting with civil society representatives and legal groups, an Acting Deputy Director-General of the DSS, identified as Mr. Patrick, explained that the agency’s decision to keep Walida in custody was based on concerns for her safety.
The case initially gained public attention following claims that Walida, described by her family as a minor from Jigawa State, had been abducted by a DSS operative, Christian Ifeanyi Onyewuenyi, and coerced into marriage and conversion to Christianity. However, the DSS stated that its internal findings so far indicate that Walida is not underage.
According to the official, information about the case first emerged through open-source channels, prompting the Service to commence an internal investigation. He confirmed that Ifeanyi is currently undergoing disciplinary procedures within the agency, adding that appropriate action would be taken if he is found guilty of any misconduct.
Addressing accusations that the DSS was shielding one of its own, the official denied any attempt to protect erring personnel. He noted that the agency has previously dismissed staff members found to have violated service rules or committed offences.
On the issue of Walida’s age, representatives of the International Federation of Women Lawyers (FIDA) Abuja Branch said documents reviewed during meetings suggest she was born in 2004, which would make her an adult. Barrister Chioma Onyenucheya-Uko, Chairperson of FIDA Abuja, stated that she personally interviewed Walida and found her coherent and lucid in her responses.
According to FIDA, an authentication from the National Population Commission (NPC) supported the 2004 birth record. Another birth certificate allegedly indicating 2008 as her year of birth reportedly surfaced later, raising questions about conflicting documentation.
The DSS further disclosed that a medical evaluation of Walida’s mental state was conducted after her family’s legal representative requested confirmation that she was of sound mind. The evaluation was carried out under the supervision of the Nigerian Medical Association (NMA), which the DSS described as a neutral body suitable for handling such a sensitive matter.
Walida’s parents were reportedly invited to attend follow-up meetings but did not appear. According to DSS officials, the family has initiated court proceedings seeking her release. The agency confirmed it has applied to vacate an earlier court order directing that she be handed over to her parents, with a ruling date reportedly fixed.
Explaining why Walida has not been released, the DSS stated that she expressed fears for her life if returned to her family. “Once somebody expresses fear about their safety, it becomes incumbent on the Service to protect that person,” the official said, describing her current status as protective custody rather than detention.
Civil society groups, including the National Youth Council of Nigeria and regional youth organizations, have participated in meetings convened by the DSS to ensure transparency. Representatives from these groups said discussions have centered on safeguarding Walida’s rights and the welfare of her child.
FIDA emphasized that its involvement is guided strictly by its mandate to protect and promote the rights of women and children. The organization stated that its priority remains Walida’s safety and best interests, regardless of religious or political considerations.
As legal proceedings unfold, the DSS has urged the public to avoid drawing premature conclusions and to allow due process to determine the facts of the case.
The matter continues to generate debate across the country, particularly given sensitivities around age, religion, and individual rights. The final resolution is expected to depend on the outcome of both the DSS internal investigation and the pending court decision.