Dangote Withdraws ICPC Petition Against Former NMDPRA Boss Farouk Ahmed as Probe Continues
Africa’s foremost industrialist, Alhaji Aliko Dangote, has formally withdrawn his petition before the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC) against the immediate past Chief Executive Officer of the Nigerian Midstream and Downstream Petroleum Regulatory Authority (NMDPRA), Alhaji Farouk Ahmed. However, the ICPC has made it clear that the withdrawal will not halt its ongoing investigation into the allegations, stressing that the matter remains firmly within the public interest.
Dangote’s petition had accused Ahmed of allegedly expending over $7 million on the education of his four children in Switzerland without verifiable lawful income to justify such expenditure. According to the petition, the funds were allegedly paid upfront as school fees covering a six-year period, raising concerns over possible abuse of public office and unexplained wealth.
Investigations revealed that Dangote’s decision to withdraw the petition from the ICPC was informed by the existence of a parallel probe by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC). Sources familiar with the matter disclosed that Dangote requested the ICPC to step aside and allow the EFCC to continue with the investigation, noting that he had initially submitted complaints to both anti-graft agencies.
An ICPC source explained that the commission had earlier invited Dangote to personally adopt his petition, in line with legal provisions that do not permit representation in criminal matters. According to the source, Dangote was asked to appear at the commission’s Abuja headquarters on December 29 to formally affirm the petition. Instead, the commission later received a letter indicating his decision to withdraw.
Related News
Rights Group Accuses Police of Judicial Persecution Over Remand of Blogger Maureen Badejo
The Committee for the Defence of Human Rights (CDHR) has accused the Nigeria Police Force of engaging in judicial persecution…
Enugu Government Declares 90-Day Amnesty for Buildings Without Approved Plans
The Enugu State Government has introduced a 90-day amnesty period for property owners whose buildings lack approved plans, offering them…
China to Remove Tariffs on Most African Imports Starting May 1, Says Xi Jinping
China has announced plans to eliminate tariffs on imports from nearly all African nations beginning May 1, a move President…
Despite this development, the ICPC has maintained that the withdrawal does not affect its statutory responsibility to investigate allegations involving public officers. “He cannot stop our investigation because the petition falls squarely within our mandate,” the source said. “We deal with matters involving the public sector and public service. This is an issue of public interest, and we must see it through to its logical conclusion.”
The source further disclosed that the ICPC has already activated formal procedures to independently verify the allegations. This includes reaching out directly to the Swiss educational institutions mentioned in the petition to confirm whether Ahmed’s children were, or are, enrolled in those schools and to establish the scale and timing of the alleged fee payments. The commission said it is currently awaiting feedback from the institutions.
The ICPC also pointed to an inter-agency understanding between itself and the EFCC, which provides that once one agency has commenced substantive action on a petition, the other may step aside to avoid duplication. Nevertheless, the commission insists that ongoing investigations already initiated under its enabling Act cannot be abandoned simply because a petitioner has withdrawn.
In a statement issued by the ICPC’s spokesperson and Head of Media and Public Communications, Mr. John Okor Odey, the commission confirmed receipt of the withdrawal letter dated January 5, 2025. The letter, submitted by Dangote’s legal counsel, Dr. O.J. Onoja, SAN, stated that the petitioner was withdrawing the December 16, 2025 petition in its entirety on the grounds that another law enforcement agency had taken over the matter.
“The ICPC wishes to state categorically that, in line with Sections 3(14) and 27(3) of the ICPC Act, investigations in the interest of the Nigerian people and the Nigerian state have already commenced and are presently ongoing,” the statement read. “The commission will therefore continue to investigate this matter in line with its statutory mandate and in the interest of transparency, accountability, and the fight against corruption.”
The development has generated widespread public debate, with some Nigerians expressing scepticism about whether the investigation will reach a definitive conclusion, while others have welcomed the ICPC’s insistence on proceeding despite the petition’s withdrawal. For many observers, the case has once again brought renewed attention to the broader issue of accountability among senior public officials and the independence of Nigeria’s anti-corruption institutions.
As both the ICPC and EFCC continue their respective processes, the outcome of the investigation is expected to test the resolve of Nigeria’s anti-graft framework and its ability to pursue high-profile cases beyond the actions or interests of individual petitioners.