Bashir Ahmad Defends Sharia, Says U.S. Cannot Dictate Nigeria’s Laws
Former presidential aide Bashir Ahmad has criticized recent comments reportedly made by a United States senator vowing to target individuals involved in the implementation of Sharia law in Nigeria. Ahmad described the statement as an act of interference in Nigeria’s internal affairs, asserting that supporting or practising Sharia does not constitute a crime.
In a post shared on his official X handle on Sunday, Ahmad, who served as a media aide to former President Muhammadu Buhari, maintained that the U.S. has no jurisdiction to determine or influence Nigeria’s legal or religious systems.
“So a U.S. senator is now proudly declaring they will target those who helped implement Sharia law in Nigeria, as if practising or supporting Sharia is a crime,” Ahmad wrote.
“You are free to oppose Sharia in your own country, but you have no jurisdiction to dictate the laws of ours. We will defend our sovereignty and our right to determine our own legal and domestic affairs.”
His post quickly went viral, sparking a wave of reactions from Nigerians across social media. Some commentators supported Ahmad’s position, describing his remarks as a defense of national sovereignty and religious freedom. Others accused him of ignoring human-rights concerns associated with the enforcement of Sharia in some northern states.
Related News
Henry Seriake Dickson Defects from PDP to Newly Formed Nigeria Democratic Congress
Senator Henry Seriake Dickson has formally defected from the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) to the newly registered Nigeria Democratic Congress…
Hon. Sarah Ivie Adidi Receives “Her Excellence Award” During International Women’s Day Event in Abuja
Reps aspirant Sarah Ivie Adidi has been honoured with the 2026 “Her Excellence Award” during an event marking International Women’s…
Governor Peter Mbah Urges Ndigbo to Return to Strategic Politics
Peter Mbah, Governor of Enugu State, has urged the Igbo political class to return to what he described as “strategic…
The controversy reportedly began after a U.S. lawmaker made remarks condemning Nigeria’s adoption of Sharia-based legal codes, suggesting that sanctions could be imposed on individuals or institutions enforcing them. Although details of the senator’s statement remain limited, it drew immediate responses from Nigerian commentators who viewed it as an attempt to undermine the country’s internal governance.
Several social media users echoed Ahmad’s call for respect for national sovereignty. One user wrote, “America should focus on its internal issues before dictating to other countries how to govern their affairs.” Another user stated that while human-rights issues must be taken seriously, “no foreign government has the authority to define the boundaries of Nigeria’s legal systems.”
However, critics argued that Ahmad’s defense of Sharia overlooked the human-rights violations that have sometimes occurred under its implementation. Some pointed to past incidents such as mob attacks, forced religious practices, and discrimination against minorities as evidence that parts of the system require reform and stronger oversight.
Commenting on the debate, civil-rights advocates emphasized that while sovereignty is important, international concern about human rights should not be dismissed outright. “Defending Sharia as a cultural or religious right does not mean ignoring the abuses carried out in its name,” one activist said. “Nigeria must continue to balance religious freedom with the protection of fundamental human rights.”
Sharia law, derived from Islamic principles, operates alongside the secular legal system in several northern Nigerian states, primarily governing personal and family matters for Muslims. Its introduction in the early 2000s generated national debate, with some Nigerians viewing it as an affirmation of religious identity and others as a challenge to the country’s secular constitution.
Ahmad’s comments add to the ongoing discourse over the limits of international involvement in domestic policy. Nigeria, as a sovereign state, maintains that its legal systems must reflect the beliefs and cultural values of its people, while foreign governments continue to express concern over laws perceived as discriminatory or inconsistent with international standards.
As discussions intensify online, observers note that the incident highlights the delicate balance between defending cultural autonomy and ensuring adherence to universal human-rights principles—a debate that continues to shape Nigeria’s political and religious landscape.