El-Rufai, Malami Victims of Selective Justice – ADC
The African Democratic Congress (ADC) has alleged that the administration of President Bola Tinubu is applying selective justice in its handling of legal cases involving two prominent political figures — former Kaduna State Governor Nasir El-Rufai and former Attorney General of the Federation Abubakar Malami.
In a statement issued by its National Publicity Secretary, Bolaji Abdullahi, the ADC expressed concern over what it described as inconsistencies in the manner the cases have been managed. The party noted that the sequence of arrests, transfers between security agencies, and the pace of enforcement actions have triggered public anxiety about whether the rule of law is being applied evenly.
According to the ADC, the movement of both men from the custody of one law enforcement agency to another in rapid succession — while investigations appear to still be ongoing — creates the impression of pre-trial punishment rather than due legal process.
“In a constitutional democracy where the law is seen to operate selectively, it becomes imperative to insist firmly and without apology that justice must be applied evenly, transparently, and without political calculation,” the party stated.
Related News
Henry Seriake Dickson Defects from PDP to Newly Formed Nigeria Democratic Congress
Senator Henry Seriake Dickson has formally defected from the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) to the newly registered Nigeria Democratic Congress…
DSS Tells Court Kaduna Man’s Tweets Could Drag Nigeria into Israel–Iran Conflict
Nigeria’s domestic intelligence agency, the Department of State Services (DSS), has told a court that social media posts allegedly made…
Nigeria Begins Evacuation of Citizens from Iran Amid Escalating Middle East Conflict
The Nigerian government has started evacuating its citizens from Iran as tensions in the Middle East intensify.
The ADC maintained that no citizen, regardless of status or former office held, should be considered above the law. However, it argued that due process must be followed in a manner that preserves public confidence in the justice system.
“If there is evidence against Malami, prosecute him transparently. If there is evidence against El-Rufai, present it before the court and allow the law to take its course,” the statement read.
The party further contrasted the cases with another unnamed high-profile matter involving allegations such as passport forgery and international conspiracy. In that instance, according to the ADC, the defendants were granted bail promptly and proceedings have been progressing swiftly in court.
“These are not minor procedural questions,” the ADC said. “They touch on issues of national integrity and international credibility. Yet, in that case, the accused persons pleaded not guilty, were granted bail, and the matter is proceeding with dispatch before the court. They are presumed innocent under the Constitution until proven otherwise.”
The ADC emphasized that the constitutional presumption of innocence must not be treated as a courtesy but as a binding guarantee applicable to all Nigerians.
Political observers note that the cases have attracted widespread debate, particularly given the roles both El-Rufai and Malami played in previous administrations. Their current legal challenges come amid heightened political tensions and shifting alliances ahead of the next election cycle.
The party concluded by affirming its support for its members, stating that it would ensure they are not isolated or intimidated while asserting their legal rights. It called on authorities to demonstrate transparency and consistency to avoid undermining confidence in democratic institutions.
As legal proceedings continue, attention remains focused on how the courts and law enforcement agencies will navigate the politically sensitive cases and whether the concerns raised about selective justice will be addressed through clear and credible judicial processes.